The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
The 5-Second Trick For cisg goverving law cases
Blog Article
Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details
93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming into the main case, It is usually a perfectly-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
To be a society, it truly is essential to carry on striving for any just legal system that ensures fairness, protection, and regard for all individuals’ right to life.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Provided the legal analysis on the topic issue, we have been in the view that the claim with the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally sound, Apart from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be matter to rules and regulations If your recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case from the petitioners for promotion may very well be regarded, however, we are clear inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion as being the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue on the approval of your competent authority.
Previous four tax years interpreted. It is far from from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Article 27 in the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment at the same time. The disparity within the shell out scale allowances of Stenographers from the District Judiciary is while in the apparent negation on the law laid down through the Supreme Court in its a variety of pronouncements. Read more
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government companies in regards to projects that could likely pose a public risk. This case can be noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all long term public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found within the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is usually a right to life itself.
The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge since it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders trying to keep in view that among the respondents has retired from service as pointed out by the counsel for that respondent university. twelve. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order concerning costs. Read more
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above mentioned order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that enables callers to get standard case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to employ and accessible 24 hours on a daily basis.
In certain jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family legislation.
Generally speaking, higher courts don't have direct oversight over the reduced courts of record, in that they cannot access out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments in the decrease courts.
one hundred fifteen . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance from the respondents that pensionary benefits could possibly be withheld on account of your allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 get more info deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension can be withheld or reduced. In some cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.